On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree we don't >> need another example on P1021RDB-PC. > > Would you accept a patch that removes all AMP device trees from upstream? > I just don't think that these very customer-specific dts files belong > upstream.
No, I think we should have at least one or two examples of AMP dts in upstream. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
