On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote: > On 7/19/2012 3:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote: >> >>> The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address >>> and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix, >>> the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and >>> fixed. >>> This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of >>> 0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning >>> -EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.t...@freescale.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.man...@freescale.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h | 4 +- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 39 >>> ++++++++++------------------ >>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >>> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >>> index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >>> /* >>> - * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc >>> + * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc >> >> we normally do 2009-2010, 2012 >> > Hi Kumar, > > Should I re-spin this patch, with the copyright year formatted per your > suggestion above?
please do - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev