On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Kent Yoder wrote: > > > James did accept my pull request, so these are already in > > > security-next... > > > > For the driver itself, it's not a big issue (though I did found issue > > while reviewing it so it will need another round of updates). For the > > code that changes arch/powerpc, especially prom_init.c, that stuff must > > at the very least be acked by me (or the acting powerpc person if I'm > > away) if it's going to go via a different tree. > > Sorry about that. Hopefully there won't be any changes there and we > can amend with your ack. > > As for the driver updates, I'd hate to see everyone else's code in the > pull request get delayed yet again. James, will it be ok to apply the > update on top of security-next?
I guess? -- James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
