On 11/16/2012 05:12 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:29:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > That's not a sufficient description of why you are making this > change. In particular, what is the motivation for and impact of using > LONG_ASM_CONST? > > Paul.
Hey Paul, I have just sent out a revised patch where I have updated the description and dropped the usage of LONG_ASM_CONST. Regards Anshuman _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
