Could you please provide a more verbose patch description

Thanks.

On 12/3/12, Li Zhong <zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low warning for ppc32,
> which is similar to commit 12660b17.
>
> Reported-by: Christian Kujau <li...@nerdbynature.de>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Christian Kujau <li...@nerdbynature.de>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
> index d22e73e..e514de5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
> @@ -439,6 +439,8 @@ ret_from_fork:
>  ret_from_kernel_thread:
>       REST_NVGPRS(r1)
>       bl      schedule_tail
> +     li      r3,0
> +     stw     r3,0(r1)
>       mtlr    r14
>       mr      r3,r15
>       PPC440EP_ERR42
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>


-- 
Regards,
Denis
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to