On 03/22, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:58:09PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > - verify_opcode()->is_swbp_insn() means: > > > > is this insn fine for uprobe? (we do not care about > > gdb, we simply ignore this problem) > > I will write up a patch for this case.. So, IIUC we do not care to send > gdb a SIGTRAP if we have replaced a conditional trap from gdb with an > unconditional uprobes one, right?
Yes. And just in case, we do not send SIGTRAP if gdb used the same/unconditional insn. We simply can't know if someone else wants to know that the task hits this breakpoint. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
