On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:14 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote: > Add new return code to rtas_flash to indicate firmware entitlement > expiry. This will be used by the update_flash script to return > appropriate message to the user.
What's the point of that patch ? It adds a definition to a private .c file not exposed to user space and doesn't do anything with it ... Ben. > Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ana...@in.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevas...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > index a7020d2..0a12c16 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_COMMIT_DL 4 /* Validate Return Status */ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_COMMIT 5 /* Validate Return Status */ > #define VALIDATE_TMP_UPDATE_DL 6 /* Validate Return Status */ > +#define VALIDATE_OUT_OF_WRNTY 7 /* Validate Return Status */ > > /* ibm,manage-flash-image operation tokens */ > #define RTAS_REJECT_TMP_IMG 0 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev