On 07/09/2013 09:24:57 PM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
+ nand@1,0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ compatible = "fsl,p1020-fcm-nand",
+ "fsl,elbc-fcm-nand";
+ reg = <0x1 0x0 0x40000>;
+
+ partition@0 {
+ /* This location must not be altered */
+ /* 1MB for u-boot Bootloader Image */
+ reg = <0x0 0x00100000>;
+ label = "NAND U-Boot Image";
+ read-only;
+ };
+
+ partition@100000 {
+ /* 1MB for DTB Image */
+ reg = <0x00100000 0x00100000>;
+ label = "NAND DTB Image";
+ };
+
+ partition@200000 {
+ /* 4MB for Linux Kernel Image */
+ reg = <0x00200000 0x00400000>;
+ label = "NAND Linux Kernel Image";
+ };
+
+ partition@600000 {
+ /* 96MB for File System Image */
+ reg = <0x00600000 0x06000000>;
+ label = "NAND FILE System Image";
+ };
This accounts for 102 MiB of the flash. The rest is just unused? Why
not increase the filesystem partition?
Also, why capitalize "FILE"?
+ spi@7000 {
+ flash@0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ compatible = "spansion,s25sl12801";
+ reg = <0>;
+ /* input clock */
+ spi-max-frequency = <40000000>;
+
+ partition@0 {
+ /* 512KB for u-boot Bootloader
Image */
+ reg = <0x0 0x00080000>;
+ label = "SPI U-Boot Image";
+ read-only;
+ };
+
+ partition@80000 {
+ /* 512KB for DTB Image*/
+ reg = <0x00080000 0x00080000>;
+ label = "SPI DTB Image";
+ };
+
+ partition@100000 {
+ /* 4MB for Linux Kernel Image */
+ reg = <0x00100000 0x00400000>;
+ label = "SPI Linux Kernel
Image";
+ };
+
+ partition@500000 {
+ /* 7MB for FS System Image */
+ reg = <0x00500000 0x00700000>;
+ label = "SPI File System Image";
+ };
+ };
Likewise.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
