On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:09:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 03:14:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> Here is a set of small independent patches that clean up or fix minor > >> things > >> across DMA slave drivers. > > The series looks fine. I am going to wait a day more and apply, pls speak > > up if > > you disagree and ack if you agree > > Looks ok to me. Reminds we can probably take this one step further > and provide a generic implementation for the common case. It's just a > bit inconsistent though that some engines will poll the completion > handler (try to advance the state of the last completed cookie) > whereas others just assume things will be completed asynchronously. agree with that. These are the inconsistencies some of which are based on hardware and some are user iterpretations...
-- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
