On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 07:09 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 15:58 -0500, Fionnuala Gunter wrote: > > The chaining value from co-processor was not being saved. This value is > > needed because it is used as the IV, for example by cts i.e. > > cts(cbc(aes)). > > > > Signed-off-by: Fionnuala Gunter <f...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Cerri <mhce...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > So now you guys are sending the patch to linuxppc-dev and not the crypto > list .. > > I need to understand things better here. Any reason why those drivers > aren't handled by the crypto maintainer ? > > Ben.
Sorry, I thought linuxppc-dev was the right tree since the patch is for a ppc driver and you've carried previous nx driver submissions upstream. I want to submit to the proper place, so what is your preference? -Fin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev