Hi Stephen, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:19AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > If the clock source name list is different, then it needs a different > compatible value, so that each compatible value can specify which clock > names are required. > > Also, the compatible value itself should always include the exact HW > that's present (most specific HW version), as well as any other HW it's > compatible with. Thank you for the comments. Yes, I did so in v1-v3, but after rethinking about the situation (Actually both the HW version and the clock mux itself are same, just the clock sources connecting to the mux might be different), so I decided to do this by abstracting the driver from those source info and letting DT binding to pass such information. Because I think putting the clock sources into the driver differed by compatible value would make the driver more like SoC-specified, not the ideal way -- SoC-independent, since the clock sources are based on SoC design, not on itself.
Thank you, Nicolin Chen _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev