On 09/30/2013 02:57 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf<ag...@suse.de> writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 15:06, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf<ag...@suse.de> writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"<aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch moves PR related tracepoints to a separate header. This
enables in converting PR to a kernel module which will be done in
later patches
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V<aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 3 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h | 234 +--------------------------
arch/powerpc/kvm/trace_pr.h | 297 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kvm/trace_pr.h
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
index 329a978..fd5b393 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include<asm/machdep.h>
#include<asm/mmu_context.h>
#include<asm/hw_irq.h>
-#include "trace.h"
+#include "trace_pr.h"
#define PTE_SIZE 12
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
index d2d280b..4556168 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include<asm/mmu_context.h>
#include<asm/hw_irq.h>
-#include "trace.h"
+#include "trace_pr.h"
#define PTE_SIZE 12
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
index 2a97279..99d0839 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
#include<linux/vmalloc.h>
#include<linux/highmem.h>
-#include "trace.h"
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include "trace_pr.h"
/* #define EXIT_DEBUG */
/* #define DEBUG_EXT */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
index a088e9a..7d5a136 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
@@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ppc_instr,
{41, "HV_PRIV"}
#endif
+#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
+/*
+ * For pr we define this in trace_pr.h since it pr can be built as
+ * a module
Not sure I understand the need. If the config option is available, so
should the struct field. Worst case that happens with HV is that we
get empty shadow_srr1 values in our trace, no?
That is not the real reason. trace.h get built as part of kvm.ko or as
part of kernel. These trace functions actually get called from
kvm-pr.ko. To make they build i would either need EXPORT_SYMBOL or move
the definition of them to kvm-pr.ko. I did the later and moved only pr
related traces to kvm-pr.ko
I fail to see why we wouldn't have a trace_hv.h file then, as that can
also be built as a module, no? And at that point I don't see why we
would need any conditionals at all in trace.h anymore, as it would
only cover generic code.
Currently HV module is not using any tracepoints. Once it start using
tracepoints we would have trace_hv.h
So why would there be an #ifndef in trace.h?
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
