On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 23:23 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Li Zong's patch works around the issue of a failing dma_set_mask(), > but as I've already said elsewhere, the real fix is to get whatever > created the struct device to initialise the dev->dma_mask with a > bus default. > > Using dma_coerce_xxx() merely makes the problem "go away" papering > over the issue - it's fine to do it this way, but someone should still > fix the broken code creating these devices...
Ok, they are created by the vio bus core, so it should be doing the job here of setting the dma_mask pointer to a proper value. Li, can you take care of that ? Look at other bus types we have in there such as the macio bus etc... Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
