Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 09:06 -0500, Hong H. Pham wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-32.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-32.h
>> index 27b2386..842846c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-32.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-32.h
>> @@ -84,10 +84,8 @@ static inline void pgtable_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather
>> *tlb,
>> static inline void __pte_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pgtable_t table,
>> unsigned long address)
>> {
>> - struct page *page = page_address(table);
>> -
>> tlb_flush_pgtable(tlb, address);
>> - pgtable_page_dtor(page);
>> - pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, page, 0);
>> + pgtable_page_dtor(table);
>> + pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, page_address(table), 0);
>> }
>
> Ok so your description of the problem confused me a bit, but I see that
> in the !64K page, pgtable_t is already a struct page so yes, the
> page_address() call here is bogus.
>
> However, I also noticed that in the 64k page case, we don't call the dto
> at all. Is that a problem ?
>
> Also, Aneesh, shouldn't we just fix the disconnect here and have
> pgtable_t always be the same type ? The way this is now is confusing
> and error prone...
With pte page fragments that may not be possible right ?. With PTE fragments,
we share the page allocated with multiple pmd entries
5c1f6ee9a31cbdac90bbb8ae1ba4475031ac74b4 should have more details
>
>> #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PGALLOC_32_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-64.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-64.h
>> index f65e27b..256d6f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc-64.h
>> @@ -144,11 +144,9 @@ static inline void pgtable_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather
>> *tlb,
>> static inline void __pte_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pgtable_t table,
>> unsigned long address)
>> {
>> - struct page *page = page_address(table);
>> -
>> tlb_flush_pgtable(tlb, address);
>> - pgtable_page_dtor(page);
>> - pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, page, 0);
>> + pgtable_page_dtor(table);
>> + pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, page_address(table), 0);
>> }
>>
>> #else /* if CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
>
> Ben.
-aneesh
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
