On 12/20/2013 07:47 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
The EXYNOS cpuidle driver code assumes that cpuidle core will handle
dev->state_count smaller than drv->state_count but currently this is
untrue (dev->state_count is used only for handling cpuidle state sysfs
entries and drv->state_count is used for all other cases) and will not
be fixed in the future as dev->state_count is planned to be removed.

Fix the issue by checking for the max supported idle state in AFTR
state's ->enter handler (exynos4_enter_lowpower()) and entering AFTR
mode only when cores other than CPU0 are offline.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnier...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
---
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 8 ++------
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
index da65b03..f57cb91 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ static int exynos4_enter_lowpower(struct cpuidle_device 
*dev,
  {
        int new_index = index;

-       /* This mode only can be entered when other core's are offline */
-       if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
+       /* AFTR can only be entered when cores other than CPU0 are offline */
+       if (num_online_cpus() > 1 || dev->cpu != 0)
                new_index = drv->safe_state_index;

        if (new_index == 0)
@@ -235,10 +235,6 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                device = &per_cpu(exynos4_cpuidle_device, cpu_id);
                device->cpu = cpu_id;

-               /* Support IDLE only */
-               if (cpu_id != 0)
-                       device->state_count = 1;
-
                ret = cpuidle_register_device(device);
                if (ret) {
                        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register cpuidle 
device\n");


Hi Bartlomiej,

thanks for this cleanup. May be you can also add another patch to switch to the generic cpuidle_register function ?

Thanks
  -- Daniel

--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to