On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:50 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > Well, in the scenarios that we're interested in, it is highly unlikely > that CONFIG_PREMPT is set. Hence we'll default to > raw_smp_processor_id() anyway. So, I think we can retain > smp_processor_id().
We don't know that. Some people are interested in running preempt on these things. If raw is ok to call here, please use it. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
