On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 15:10 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@freescale.com>
>
> There are several places where descriptors are freed using identical code.
> This patch puts this code into a function to reduce code duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <qiang....@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/fsldma.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index b71cc04..b5a0ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,19 @@ static dma_cookie_t fsl_dma_tx_submit(struct
> dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> }
>
> /**
> + * fsl_dma_free_descriptor - Free descriptor from channel's DMA pool.
> + * @chan : Freescale DMA channel
> + * @desc: descriptor to be freed
> + */
> +static void fsl_dma_free_descriptor(struct fsldma_chan *chan,
> + struct fsl_desc_sw *desc)
> +{
> + list_del(&desc->node);
> + chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc);
> + dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * fsl_dma_alloc_descriptor - Allocate descriptor from channel's DMA pool.
> * @chan : Freescale DMA channel
> *
> @@ -489,11 +502,8 @@ static void fsldma_free_desc_list(struct fsldma_chan
> *chan,
> {
> struct fsl_desc_sw *desc, *_desc;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, list, node) {
> - list_del(&desc->node);
> - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc);
> - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys);
> - }
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, list, node)
> + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);
> }
>
> static void fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(struct fsldma_chan *chan,
> @@ -501,11 +511,8 @@ static void fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(struct
> fsldma_chan *chan,
> {
> struct fsl_desc_sw *desc, *_desc;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node) {
> - list_del(&desc->node);
> - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc);
> - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys);
> - }
> + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node)
> + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -819,8 +826,7 @@ static void fsldma_cleanup_descriptor(struct fsldma_chan
> *chan,
> dma_run_dependencies(txd);
>
> dma_descriptor_unmap(txd);
> - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc);
> - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, txd->phys);
> + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);
Here is no list_del() call since it's been called in dma_do_tasklet().
What will be the result of double list_del() against the same node?
> }
>
> /**
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
