On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 16:33 +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote: > >>> + * hardware channel, subsequent descriptors are either in > >>> + * process or have not been submitted > >> Dot at the eol. Check in all comments. > > > > Even though I saw there are other comments without the dots, I think > > it is better to have it. > > Thanks, all. > > > Hmm... think it again, it it really necessary to have it? > Even I have it in my patch, there are already so many comments exists > without it.
For my opinion is better to keep style in your patches. Better if it commonly used style in the driver. But comment against comments is really minor thing. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
