On 29.05.14 23:52, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 23:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 29.05.14 09:45, Michael Neuling wrote:
+/* Values for 2nd argument to H_SET_MODE */
+#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_SET_CIABR 1
+#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_SET_DAWR 2
+#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_ADDR_TRANS_MODE 3
+#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_LE 4
Much better, but I think you want to make use of these in non-kvm code too,
no? At least the LE one is definitely already implemented as call :)
Sure but that's a different patch.... below.
Ben, how would you like to handle these 2 patches? If you give me an ack
I can just put this patch into my kvm queue. Alternatively we could both
carry a patch that adds the H_SET_MODE header bits only and whoever hits
Linus' tree first wins ;).
No biggie. Worst case it's a trivial conflict.
Well, the way the patches are split right now it won't be a conflict,
but a build failure on either side.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
