On 7/18/14, Nikhil Badola <nikhil.bad...@freescale.com> wrote:
> Modifies get_dma_ops() implementation on ppc arch to check null condition
which means that dma is not supported.
Could you please describe the use case where the ops is null.
> for dev->archdata.dma_ops; returns common dma_direct_ops structure in
> case its NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Badola <nikhil.bad...@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 150866b..d73bae8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -86,10 +86,12 @@ static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct
> device *dev)
> */
> if (unlikely(dev == NULL))
> return NULL;
> -
> - return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> + if (dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> + return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> + return &dma_direct_ops;
> }
>
> +
> static inline void set_dma_ops(struct device *dev, struct dma_map_ops *ops)
> {
> dev->archdata.dma_ops = ops;
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
Regards,
Denis
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
