On 15/01/15 08:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For > example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such > accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145) > > Change the p2m code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vra...@citrix.com> Let me know if you want me to merge this via the Xen tree. David _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
