On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:35:18PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 17:34 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
>> to inject the specified EEH error, which is represented by
>> (struct vfio_eeh_pe_err), to the indicated PE for testing purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/vfio.txt | 47
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 14 +++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>[snip]
>> @@ -490,6 +499,29 @@ struct vfio_eeh_pe_op {
>> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_HOT 6 /* Assert hot reset
>> */
>> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL 7 /* Assert fundamental
>> reset */
>> #define VFIO_EEH_PE_CONFIGURE 8 /* PE configuration
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR 9 /* Inject EEH error
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_TYPE_32 0 /* 32-bits EEH error
>> type */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_TYPE_64 1 /* 64-bits EEH error
>> type */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_MEM_ADDR 0 /* Memory load
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_MEM_DATA 1
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_IO_ADDR 2 /* IO load
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_IO_DATA 3
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_CFG_ADDR 4 /* Config load
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_CFG_DATA 5
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_MEM_ADDR 6 /* Memory store
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_MEM_DATA 7
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_IO_ADDR 8 /* IO store
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_IO_DATA 9
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_CFG_ADDR 10 /* Config store
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_CFG_DATA 11
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_ADDR 12 /* DMA read
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_DATA 13
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_MASTER 14
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_TARGET 15
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_ADDR 16 /* DMA write
>> */
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_DATA 17
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_MASTER 18
>> +#define VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_TARGET 19
>
>This data duplication from patch 1/2 is kind of concerning. In one case
>we're adding to arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h, which is a kernel
>internal interface and entirely changeable, in the other we're matching
>those current definitions in uapi, which needs to be stable. Are these
>indexes part of a spec that we can rely on them being stable or do we
>need some sort of translation layer to go from the vfio uapi defined
>value to the kernel internal version? Thanks,
>
All those constants are defined by PAPR specification, and those constants
defined here or by PATCH[1/2] aren't expected to be changed.
Thanks,
Gavin
>Alex
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
