On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 18:46 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> + clockgen: global-utilities@e1000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,t1023-clockgen", "fsl,qoriq-clockgen-2.0",
> + "fixed-clock";
> + reg = <0xe1000 0x1000>;
> + clock-output-names = "sysclk";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
Why aren't you using qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi? Where is ranges?
We've been putting the sysclk in its own node, though even after reading
the discussion in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274134/ and
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/290226/ I still don't know what was
wrong with the unified approach.
> + data-only@0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qe-muram-data",
> + "fsl,cpm-muram-data";
> + reg = <0x0 0x6000>;
Whitespace.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
