On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:30:46PM +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote:
> From: Igal Liberman <[email protected]>
> 
> This patch adds two boolean properties to FMan Port.
> FMan has 3 types of ports:
>       - 1G ports
>               By default, all ports support 1G rate
>       - 10G Ports
>               Port which use 10G hardware, and configured as 10G
>       - 10G Best effort ports
>               Ports which use 1G hardware, configured as 10G, in this case,
>               the rate is not guaranteed.
> The new properties help to distinguish the different type of ports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt       |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt
> index edda55f..76a7cba 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt
> @@ -189,6 +189,19 @@ PROPERTIES
>               Definition: There is one reg region describing the port
>               configuration registers.
>  
> +- 10G-support
> +             Usage: optional
> +             Value type: boolean
> +             Definition: The default port rate is 1G.
> +             If this property exists, the port is configured as 10G port.

fsl,fman-10g-port

s/is configured as 10G port/is a 10G port/

> +- best-effort-port
> +             Usage: optional
> +             Value type: boolean
> +             Definition: Can be defined only if 10G-support is set.
> +             This property marks a best-effort 10G port (1G hardware
> +             configured as 10G, 10G rate is not guaranteed).

fsl,fman-best-effort-port

s/1G hardware configured as 10G/10G port that may not be capable of line
rate/ or something along those lines.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to