On 26/09/15 09:15, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
During run-time the driver can be very chatty and spam the system
kernel log. Various print statements can be limited and/or moved
to development-only mode. Additionally, numerous prints can be
converted to trace the corresponding device.

The following changes were made:
  - pr_debug to pr_devel
  - pr_debug to pr_debug_ratelimited
  - pr_err to dev_err
  - pr_debug to dev_dbg

Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com>

Changes mostly look fine, further comments below.

--- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ static struct afu_cmd *cmd_checkout(struct afu *afu)
                cmd = &afu->cmd[k];

                if (!atomic_dec_if_positive(&cmd->free)) {
-                       pr_debug("%s: returning found index=%d\n",
-                                __func__, cmd->slot);
+                       pr_devel("%s: returning found index=%d cmd=%p\n",
+                                __func__, cmd->slot, cmd);

        pr_debug("%s: cmd failed afu_rc=%d scsi_rc=%d fc_rc=%d "
-                "afu_extra=0x%X, scsi_entra=0x%X, fc_extra=0x%X\n",
+                "afu_extra=0x%X, scsi_extra=0x%X, fc_extra=0x%X\n",
                 __func__, ioasa->rc.afu_rc, ioasa->rc.scsi_rc,
                 ioasa->rc.fc_rc, ioasa->afu_extra, ioasa->scsi_extra,
                 ioasa->fc_extra);

Minor nitpicking: mention that you fix these in the commit message.

@@ -240,9 +240,9 @@ static void cmd_complete(struct afu_cmd *cmd)
                cmd_is_tmf = cmd->cmd_tmf;
                cmd_checkin(cmd); /* Don't use cmd after here */

-               pr_debug("%s: calling scsi_set_resid, scp=%p "
-                        "result=%X resid=%d\n", __func__,
-                        scp, scp->result, resid);
+               pr_debug_ratelimited("%s: calling scsi_done scp=%p result=%X "
+                                    "ioasc=%d\n", __func__, scp, scp->result,
+                                    cmd->sa.ioasc);

                scsi_set_resid(scp, resid);
                scsi_dma_unmap(scp);

Why has the message changed from scsi_set_resid to scsi_done, and should the message be moved to immediately before the scsi_done call?


Andrew

--
Andrew Donnellan              Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com  Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work)        IBM Australia Limited

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to