On 1.10.2015 17:55, Matthew R. Ochs wrote: > If the same virtual LUN is accessed over multiple cards, only accesses > made over the first card will be valid. Accesses made over the second > card will go to the wrong LUN causing data corruption. > > This is because the global LUN's mode word was being used to determine > whether the LUN table for that card needs to be programmed. The mode > word would be setup by the first card, causing the LUN table for the > second card to not be programmed. > > By unconditionally initializing the LUN table (not depending on the > mode word), the problem is avoided. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Brian King <brk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <the...@redhat.com> Tomas _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
