On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:33:47PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-26-10 at 10:15:36 UTC, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > This patch fixes two problems to make value-returning atomics and
> > {cmp}xchg fully ordered on PPC.
>
> Hi Boqun,
>
> Can you please split this into two patches. One that does the cmpxchg change
> and one that changes PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER.
> OK, make sense ;-) > Also given how pervasive this change is I'd like to take it via the powerpc > next tree, so can you please send this patch (which will be two after you > split > it) as powerpc patches. And the rest can go via tip? > One problem is that patch 5 will remove __xchg_u32 and __xchg_64 entirely, which are modified in this patch(patch 1), so there will be some conflicts if two branch get merged, I think. Alternative way is that all this series go to powerpc next tree as most of the dependent patches are already there. I just need to remove inc/dec related code and resend them when appropriate. Besides, I can pull patch 2 out and send it as a tip patch because it's general code and no one depends on this in this series. To summerize: patch 1(split to two), 3, 4(remove inc/dec implementation), 5, 6 sent as powerpc patches for powerpc next, patch 2(unmodified) sent as tip patch for locking/core. Peter and Michael, this works for you both? Regards,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
