On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:22:40AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:06:52AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > To summerize: > > > > > > patch 1(split to two), 3, 4(remove inc/dec implementation), 5, 6 sent as > > > powerpc patches for powerpc next, patch 2(unmodified) sent as tip patch > > > for locking/core. > > > > > > Peter and Michael, this works for you both? > > > > > > > Thoughts? ;-) > > > > Peter and Michael, I will split patch 1 to two and send them as patches > for powerpc next first. The rest of this can wait util we are on the > same page of where they'd better go. >
I'm about to send patch 2(adding trivial tests) as a patch for the tip tree, and rest of this series will be patches for powerpc next. Will, AFAIK, you are currently working on variants on arm64, right? I wonder whether you depend on patch 3 (allow archictures to provide self-defined __atomic_op_*), if so I can also send patch 3 as a patch for tip tree and wait until it merged into powerpc next to send the rest. Thanks and Best Regards, Boqun
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
