On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:32:08PM -0400, Josh Huber wrote: > Tom Rini <trini at kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > > But the bi_recs in 2.5 won't look like 2.4.current. > > bummer...can it not be changed in a compatible manner?
Not really. In 2.4 we toss the bi_recs near the end of the kernel+BSS, i _think_. In 2.5 we want r<3 or 4 or so> to be a pointer to where they are. This is why we've been waiting until 2.5, we want to break compatibility. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
