On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <87k7ytygaf.fsf at mclinux.com> Josh Huber wrote: > > Tom Rini <trini at kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > > > > But the bi_recs in 2.5 won't look like 2.4.current. > > > > bummer...can it not be changed in a compatible manner? > > Where can I get more information what it will look like in 2.5? I'd > like to be able to have PPCBoot prepared for this change, and ideally > in a way that provides a soft migration from current kernel versions > to the new stuff.
Search the -dev archives for '2.5 birecs' or '2.5 bi recs'. It was also on the (old) -commit list before that. > Or is there even a discussion of this stuff where one can at least > inject ideas or point out thinks that might cause problems - BEFORE > everything is cast in stone? Well, it's already been 'agreeded' to look somewhat like the current bi_recs (<asm/bootinfo.h>). Different location and more of. And other changes that haven't been fleshed out.. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
