sorry! ;) See my reply at the right location! On 8/24/06, T Ziomek <ctz001 at email.mot.com> wrote: > > [top-posting fixed :-) ] > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Wade Maxfield wrote: > > > > On 8/24/06, Peter Ryser <peter.ryser at xilinx.com> wrote: > >> > >> Wade, > >> > >> are you sure that you did not build your hardware with evaluation cores > of > >> the licenses? If you are using the evaluation licenses the hardware > (FPGA > >> design) will stop working after a certain amount of time and you will > see a > >> lock-up. > > > > Good question. How long before lockup? The only core that should be > > licensed is the ethernet, and I know it was sysgened on a system with a > > license. This is the Xilinx reference design for the ml403 board. > > When we were using the eval version of Xilinx's 10/100 EMAC it would time- > out after 8 hours (and the kernel would panic since our root fs was NFS- > mounted). > > If your only [to-be-]licensed core is Ethernet, then I take it you're > using > the UARTLite, or a non-Xilinx UART? We used Xilinx's 16550-compatible > UART, > which is licensed, but I never ran with the eval version of that IP block > and so have no idea how long it will function before shutting down.
We are doing an evaluation right now. We have operational 8 hours 55 minutes so far and counting on the Xilinx 16550 compatible uart. I think that is the cause of the problem for us, but not sure so far. Tom > -- > A: Because it breaks the logical | > flow of the message. | Email to user 'CTZ001' > | at 'email.mot.com' > Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? | x<>y A2. but only for algebraic. RPN likes it that way. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060824/98b158bc/attachment.htm