On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:54:32 +0100 (MET) Stefan Roese <ml at stefan-roese.de> wrote: > Let's see, if I got this right. You mean that on such a platform, where 0 is > a > valid physical IRQ, we should assign another value as virtual IRQ number (not > 0 and not -1 of course). And then the platform "pic" implementation should > take care of the remapping of these virtual IRQ numbers to the physical > numbers. > > Correct?
Absolutely correct in all the detail.
