On Monday 20 November 2006 12:42, Alan wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:00:36 +0100 > > Stefan Roese <ml at stefan-roese.de> wrote: > > This patch fixes a problem seen on multiple 4xx platforms, where > > the UART0 interrupt number is 0. The macro "is_real_interrupt" lead > > on those systems to not use an real interrupt but the timer based > > implementation. > > NAK.
I knew it. ;-) > Zero means "no interrupt" in the Linux space. If you have a physical IRQ > 0 remap it to a convenient number (eg map IRQ's + 1, or stick it on the > end). The logical and physical IRQ numbering in Linux don't have to match > up - and given some platforms have IRQ numbering per bus and the like > clearly doesn't in many cases. Let's see, if I got this right. You mean that on such a platform, where 0 is a valid physical IRQ, we should assign another value as virtual IRQ number (not 0 and not -1 of course). And then the platform "pic" implementation should take care of the remapping of these virtual IRQ numbers to the physical numbers. Correct? Best regards, Stefan
