On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > Hubert Figuiere wrote: > >On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:31, Steven Scholz wrote: > > > >>The BK linuxppc_2_4_devel tree has another problem as well: > >> > >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o: In function `probe_hwif': > >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): undefined reference to > >>`wait_hwif_ready' > >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): relocation truncated to fit: > >>R_PPC_REL24 > >>wait_hwif_ready > >> > >>ide-probe.c contains a call for wait_hwif_ready(), which is not defined. > >>This function exisists in the vanilla source though! > >> > >>I supposed something went wrong while merging/syncing the IDE changes > >>from the > >>official tree... > > > >Change 'wait_hwif_ready' by 'ide_wait_hwif_ready' in both ide-probe.c > >and ide.c > Ok. This obviously fixes it. > I just noticed that I might have used the wrong source tree. > > So which is the BK tree to use: > > linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???
It depends on where what you want to use exists. If something is in _devel and not in linuxppc-2.4, patches to move features over one at a time would be happily reviewed. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/