Tom, >>>>So which is the BK tree to use: >>>>linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ??? > > Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such > as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx > that didn't happen in 2_4_devel. > >>http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the >>"old PPC development tree" !? > > That's correct. It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of > trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well.
I suppose we need both trees. Otherwise you would have got rid of one. Right? :o) Steven ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/