I am sorry. I meant 64Mhz , not 66Mhz. Navin.
-----Original Message----- From: Navin Boppuri Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:33 PM To: linuxppc-embedded at lists.linuxppc.org Cc: laurent.pinchart at capflow.com Subject: RE: linux-2.4.18 & copy-back cache mode I am running my MPC855T at 66Mhz 1:1 CPU/bus clock mode without any problems. I used an app. note from Motorola to do this and according to the app.note, we just need to satisfy some timing constraints on the processor (latency of data reaching the MPC pins from SDRAM). The app. note suggests using specific Micron SDRAM which satisfy all these requirements. Navin. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Malek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:50 PM To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: laurent.pinchart at capflow.com; linuxppc-embedded at lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.18 & copy-back cache mode Wolfgang Denk wrote: > There are no differences AFAIK. It's just a faster CPU that allows 66 > or even 76 MHz with 1:1 CPU/bus clock mode. Interesting. Faster than 50 MHz cores used to require the 2:1 bus clock division. I don't remember timing parameters that would exceed 50 MHz. Yes, the part will let you do that, but I thought that was outside of the part specification. I guess I'll have to take a look. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
