On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:37:51PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> Split management message creation to more fine-grained functions to allow
> notification messages to be created.
I must admit I didn't understand what you did, at first reading. Can
you lose a few words about how you split the code and why?
Is it that the 'fill' method is shared by regular management replies
and by the event notifiers?
...
> +struct ptp_message *port_management_reply(struct PortIdentity pid,
> + struct port *ingress,
> + struct ptp_message *req)
> +{
> + UInteger8 boundaryHops;
> +
> + boundaryHops = req->management.startingBoundaryHops -
> req->management.boundaryHops;
Line too long.
Thanks,
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
