On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:17:54AM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote: > On some platforms compilation issues due to clock_nanosleep were occuring. The > simple test for __uClinux__ was not sufficient. > > Implement full detection of clock_nanosleep in incdefs.h by compiling a short > C > file. incdefs.sh now sets a new HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP literal. missing.h is > changed accordingly.
No, no, no. We are not going to start compiling fragments like autotools. That way is obsolete madness. There has got to be a better way. What problem are you trying to solve? Your uClinux actually does offer clock_nanosleep? Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
