That is misleading. Some earlier versions of uclibc completely lack clock_nanosleep().
Petr On 23/05/17 06:42, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:05:39PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote: >> If you don't like it, please take my email just as a bugreport: linuxptp >> fails to build with uclibc, details in my previous emails. > Let me fix that for you: > > bugreport: Improperly configured uClibc lacks clock_nanosleep. > >> I don't have the time and resources to investigate this deeper. > Then nothing will get done, but I really don't care. > > Thanks, > Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel