That is misleading. Some earlier versions of uclibc completely lack 
clock_nanosleep().

Petr

On 23/05/17 06:42, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:05:39PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>> If you don't like it, please take my email just as a bugreport: linuxptp
>> fails to build with uclibc, details in my previous emails.
> Let me fix that for you:
>
> bugreport: Improperly configured uClibc lacks clock_nanosleep.
>
>> I don't have the time and resources to investigate this deeper.
> Then nothing will get done, but I really don't care.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to