On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 07:33:03PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Then it is not correct to "continue" the loop, since it will keep
> iterating through the pollfd array for sockets that were closed in the
> meantime.
> And don't we want to set up a fault timer, to clear it eventually?
Ah! Right you are ...
diff --git a/clock.c b/clock.c
index f43cc2a..a66d189 100644
--- a/clock.c
+++ b/clock.c
@@ -1559,8 +1559,14 @@ int clock_poll(struct clock *c)
LIST_FOREACH(p, &c->ports, list) {
/* Let the ports handle their events. */
for (i = 0; i < N_POLLFD; i++) {
- if (cur[i].revents & (POLLIN|POLLPRI)) {
- event = port_event(p, i);
+ if (cur[i].revents & (POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR)) {
+ if (cur[i].revents & POLLERR) {
+ pr_err("port %d: unexpected socket
error",
+ port_number(p));
+ event = EV_FAULT_DETECTED;
+ } else {
+ event = port_event(p, i);
+ }
if (EV_STATE_DECISION_EVENT == event) {
c->sde = 1;
}
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
