On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:51:52AM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: > How specific is this to chronyd?
AFAIK no other application implements the server side of the protocol. > Would it make sense to call this chronysock > instead of just sock? Yes, that makes sense. If there are no other issues with the patches, I can resend. > The implementation seems fine but its using an interface that was defined by > chrony. I suppose another application could implement the same interface > though.. ntpsec might be interested in implementing it. We'll see. -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
