> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 9:37 AM > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:57:46AM +0000, Joerg Christian (LWE) wrote: > > When I stepped the master clock I had this result on the slave, no > > matter what value I use for fault_reset_interval. I have always the s0 for > > 16 > seconds. > > It's not related to the fault reset interval. In the s0 state the PI servo is > measuring > frequency of the clock and the length of the interval is inversely > proportional to > the I constant. If you need to reduce the interval, you can use a larger I > constant, > or use a different servo.
OK, that makes sense. I now tested the servos pi, linreg, ntpshm and nullf. What I need would be a mix of nullf and pi/linreg. When the deviation is smaller than the step_threshold change the clock frequency. When the deviation is bigger than the step_threshold go immediately to s1 and step the clock. Are there other servos available than the above mentioned? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
