The 06/05/2018 15:47, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:42:51PM +0000, Rob Cornall wrote: > > But just for my feasibility testing purposes if I: > > --Pass eth0 (imx6 mac connected to cpu port of dsa switch) to ptp4l so it > > can create the clock and enable +timestamping etc, and > > --In my patch just bind the udp socket to 'br0' instead of 'eth0' (and > > join mcast group on 'br0') > > Doesn't this suffice to allow recving traffic over a bridge interface? > > That is really not a general solution by any means. > > Thanks, > Richard
I realize its not a general solution, but just for testing feasibility at this moment? For my other previous question I had, about Syncs and Delay_Reqs having 0 in the timestamp values (I had attached a capture) I see this also occuring in a device with no switch connected and no bridge interface - only an imx6 mac to a phy. I don't think this is expected behavior but it seems to be functioning okay? Thanks, Rob C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
