> -----Original Message-----
> From: pavan-lakote <pavan-lak...@looptelecom.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 7:57 PM
> To: 'Richard Cochran' <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] switchover fails when having multiple unicast
> master
>
> >
> > Why don't you want to synchronize the local clock?
>
> We do synchronize the clock but using our own clock servo algorithm.
> That's the reason we wanted to run ptp4l as free running clock.
> Is there anything I'm missing here to understand?
>
You could implement this new servo algorithm in the same manner that existing
servo algorithms are done in the code base. The interface is intentionally
decided to allow new algorithms to be added. Doing so would mean it could
integrate properly and would cause the state transitions to occur as expected.
Thanks,
Jake
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
