> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2021 7:15 AM
> To: Дмитрий Кандыбка <d.kandy...@gmail.com>
> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] HW timestamp issue
> 
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 03:02:39PM +0300, Дмитрий Кандыбка wrote:
> > I've met with ptp4l timesync issue. Master send SYNC packets without
> > timestamp and slave doesn't handle this case when twoStepFlag set to 1. The
> > IEEE 1588 standard says that SYNC messages in 2-step ptp don't need
> > timestamp. It enough to have timestamp in FOLLOW_UP messages.
> 
> No, you are mistaken.  The Sync message needs an ingress time stamp at
> the client.
> 
> > *Software versions*:
> > *# ethtool -i enp2s0f0
> >                      *
> >     driver: i40e
> 
> This one again!   Always causing trouble.
> 

Heh, yep this driver has been problematic in the past.

> > *linux kernel version: *4.15.0-142-generic
> 
> Might be too old.  I guess the i40e driver has bugs.  Try an up to
> date kernel.
> 
> Good luck,
> Richard

I would recommend trying a newer kernel and seeing if this improves. I am not 
really aware of any specific issue related to missing ingress timestamps though 
:(

Thanks,
Jake


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to