On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote: > Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > >> * William Cohen <[email protected]> [2011-02-10 09:27]: > >>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > >>>>> what's the status of abandoning opxml? > >>>>> It seems to me that it's still in use... > >>>> > >>>> The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use. > >>>> > >>>> Andrew > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > >>> > >>> > >>> Cool, that would allow the elimination of oprofile-devel and it's > >>> undesirable static libraries. > >>> > >>> Is 0.7 going to make it for Fedora 15? > >> > >> Perhaps. I'll also have to verify my above statement :) > > > > The R0_7_0 tag and trunk don't use opxml anymore. What's left is some > > left-over code removal and documentation update.
> So I presume the updated oprofile plugin will leverage the native XML > output from opreport, right? Yes. > And how about the events list? Does it > use the XML output from ophelp? Yes. > If so, this is really good news from > my perspective since (as I had noted in my Jan 14 posting) the current > version of this plugin is completely broken for IBM Power systems. We would very much appreciate feedback about the Eclipse oprofile plug-in >= 0.7.0 on IBM Power systems. Thanks! --Severin _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
