Severin Gehwolf wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote: >> Severin Gehwolf wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: >>>> * William Cohen <[email protected]> [2011-02-10 09:27]: >>>>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: >>>>>>> what's the status of abandoning opxml? >>>>>>> It seems to me that it's still in use... >>>>>> >>>>>> The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cool, that would allow the elimination of oprofile-devel and it's >>>>> undesirable static libraries. >>>>> >>>>> Is 0.7 going to make it for Fedora 15? >>>> >>>> Perhaps. I'll also have to verify my above statement :) >>> >>> The R0_7_0 tag and trunk don't use opxml anymore. What's left is some >>> left-over code removal and documentation update. > >> So I presume the updated oprofile plugin will leverage the native XML >> output from opreport, right? > > Yes. > >> And how about the events list? Does it >> use the XML output from ophelp? > > Yes. > >> If so, this is really good news from >> my perspective since (as I had noted in my Jan 14 posting) the current >> version of this plugin is completely broken for IBM Power systems. > > We would very much appreciate feedback about the Eclipse oprofile > plug-in >= 0.7.0 on IBM Power systems. My team member, Daniel (on cc), will have a look. I presume he should install from http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/updates-nightly?
Thanks. -Maynard > > Thanks! > > --Severin > _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
