* akurtakov <akurta...@gmail.com> [2011-10-06 02:28]: > >> 3. Bundle/Feature naming - that's what provoked this mail, I appreciate the > >> fact that tycho devs showed the problem. It's confusing (at least) > >> especially > >> in feature.xml files (include vs. import). My suggestion is to make the > >> feature > >> have the module name (e.g. org.eclipse.linuxtools.changelog) and if there > >> is a > >> module with the same name rename it to smth that describes it better e.g. > >> org.eclipse.linuxtools.changelog.core. Changelog is used intentionally > >> because > >> it's already this way. > > > > +1 for clean core/UI separation and clearer bundle names. Note that > > bundle re-names will affect consumers just like you mentioned earlier, > > Alex, so we should be _very_ careful about such changes. > > There is no better time to do such thing. Post 1.0 is gonna be too much > problem.
Agreed, we standardize and define this well ahead of 1.0 (Juno/June 2012). Andrew _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
