On 18:18:04 Thursday 06 October 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * akurtakov <akurta...@gmail.com> [2011-10-06 02:28]: > > >> 3. Bundle/Feature naming - that's what provoked this mail, I > > >> appreciate the fact that tycho devs showed the problem. It's > > >> confusing (at least) especially in feature.xml files (include vs. > > >> import). My suggestion is to make the feature have the module name > > >> (e.g. org.eclipse.linuxtools.changelog) and if there is a module with > > >> the same name rename it to smth that describes it better e.g. > > >> org.eclipse.linuxtools.changelog.core. Changelog is used > > >> intentionally because it's already this way. > > > > > > +1 for clean core/UI separation and clearer bundle names. Note that > > > bundle re-names will affect consumers just like you mentioned earlier, > > > Alex, so we should be _very_ careful about such changes. > > > > There is no better time to do such thing. Post 1.0 is gonna be too much > > problem. > > Agreed, we standardize and define this well ahead of 1.0 (Juno/June > 2012).
I'm starting to do the needed changes. Some module owners decided to fix the problem in different way compared to the proposed one - fine by me as they have done the changes themselves. The rest will have to use whatever I do :). Not many people say a word about these things and even less are ready to spend time discussing it so we can come with a suitable solution so putting the 1.0 stamp looks a really hard task to me. Let's hope that I'll be proven wron. Regards, Alex > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
