On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote: > Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next release part > of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built from the > stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our Juno > milestone builds as 1.0.0 or should we have waited until our final > milestone?
Personally, I would prefer if we mark them as 0.10 until we are really sure we can sign by these API. What others think? Alex > > -- Jeff J. > > On 10/28/2011 12:50 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > Hi Francois, > > > > In working on the Juno build, I noticed that you bumped up Profiling, > > Callgraph, and Valgrind to 1.0.0 as well as the main pom.xml as part of > > following the releng wiki. 1.0.0 is a special version number. The actual > > next release should be 0.9.1. > > > > Alex, can we down-grade these on the nightly update site? It would mean > > any user that managed to update from there would have to uninstall and > > re-update to see any updates in the next bit. I can rebuild this > > afternoon. > > > > -- Jeff J. > > _______________________________________________ > > linuxtools-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
